The Apple Watch Series 8 was a bit of a boring release for Apple’s wearable, as it wasn’t a huge upgrade over the Apple Watch Series 7; Apple seemed to spend more energy focusing on the Apple Watch Ultra instead. The only real upgrades for the Series 8 were the newer-generation S8 chip and a new body temperature sensor, though the use cases for that are pretty limited. But if you didn’t have a Series 7, then the Apple Watch Series 8 was still a great upgrade for those coming from older models.
We’re still a few months away from Apple revealing the next generation of Apple Watch with a Series 9 model, which is most likely coming sometime in the fall, along with the iPhone 15. But until then, here’s what we know so far, as well as what we’re hoping to see in the Apple Watch Series 9.
For the past few years, Apple has been rather iterative with the upgrades for the Apple Watch. Ever since the Series 6 added blood oxygen monitoring, there haven’t been any other big additions for health sensors besides temperature with the Series 8.
A lot of people, including myself, are hoping for Apple to add nonintrusive blood glucose monitoring, but the technology for that may still be years away. For the Series 9, we may not be getting any major new health sensors, as it looks more and more like an iterative upgrade.
However, we might see an improvement with the processor used in the Apple Watch Series 9. Previously, Apple Watches used the S-series chip in the wearable, with the Series 8 using the latest S8 chip, though it’s pretty much the same as the S7 from the
But according to Bloomberg’s Mark Gurman, Apple may be introducing new chip technology with the S9, which is rumored to be built with the same technology as the A15 chip currently in the iPhone 14. With these improvements, we could see faster performance, better efficiency, and improved battery life and load times.
Aside from the improved chip technology, there may not be any other major changes with the
At the moment, the
It’s always possible that Apple could increase the price this year, but this early on in the rumor cycle, we can’t so for sure how likely that may be for the Series 9.
Typically, the Apple Watch is released alongside the new iPhone model. This year, that means that the
Once announced, preorders open up around Friday the week of the announcement, with a general release the following Friday. We obviously can’t guarantee the
Nonintrusive blood glucose monitoring
I’m not sure if this would even be possible this year, but it’s something that will continue to remain at the top of my wish list until it comes to fruition. Plus, a recent report makes it look like Apple has reached a significant milestone that may make this a reality sooner rather than later.
According to a report from Bloomberg in February 2023, Apple engineers have a functioning proof of concept for noninvasive blood glucose monitoring technology that uses “silicone photonics” combined with “optical absorption spectroscopy” measurements. This tech utilizes “lasers to emit specific wavelengths of light into an area below the skin where there is interstitial fluid — substances that leak out of capillaries — that can be absorbed by glucose.” Then this light gets reflected back to the sensor, which would be on a wearable like the Apple Watch, to indicate the concentration of glucose. Through an algorithm, the user’s blood glucose level can then be determined.
Apple is said to be working with TSMC (the company that also manufactures the A-series chips in recent iPhone models) to create its own silicon photonic chips.
Again, this is only a proof of concept, so it’s almost certainly not coming to the
After all, I’m still using an Apple Watch Series 5 right now because a better way to monitor my blood glucose levels (multiple finger pricks every day suck) is literally the one thing I’ve been holding out for.
Longer battery life
The main Apple Watch lineup has always been a one-day smartwatch, and that’s fine. But when you have the
In our Apple Watch Series 8 review, Mobile Editor Joe Maring typically ended the day with about 30% to 40% battery remaining, and after tracking sleep, there would be about 23% battery left. Of course, the Series 8 has fast charging speeds that let you go from zero to 80% in about 45 minutes, so if you’re low on juice, it doesn’t take too long to get it back to full.
Still, I would love to see Apple make the battery life a little bit longer with the Series 9. I’m not talking about making it last an impressive 36-plus hours like the
A focus on scratch-resistant glass
Typically with Apple’s iPhone and Apple Watch devices, the brand focuses on how crack-resistant the device is — such as with the iPhone’s Ceramic Shield and the Ion-X or sapphire crystal displays on the aluminum or stainless steel Apple Watches, respectively.
But what about scratch resistance? While Apple claims that its Ceramic Shield is crack- and scratch-resistant, I actually seemed to have gotten more scratches on my iPhone 12 Pro back in the day, which eventually bugged the hell out of me and thus led me to actually use screen protectors. I still have a titanium Apple Watch Series 5, which has been surprisingly scratch-free after all this time, but I fear that recent aluminum Apple Watch models may not be so scratch-resistant.
I would love to see more scratch resistance on the
Improved security with biometrics
Currently, the Apple Watch can only be secured by a passcode, whether it’s simple or a longer passcode. You can also unlock the Apple Watch with your iPhone if it’s nearby, and the Wrist Detection feature makes sure that it stays locked when you’re not wearing it if a passcode was enabled.
All of these things work, but Apple could do something better. I’m always hoping to see more methods of security, so I think it would be great if Apple could strengthen Apple Watch security by adding biometrics. Perhaps a Touch ID sensor in the Digital Crown or side button? Passcodes aren’t the most secure method, and iPhones still have either Touch ID or Face ID as an extra layer of security. Of course, it would be optional to use, but I always think extra peace of mind is worth it.
Better body temperature sensors
Apple added body temperature sensors in the
Still, as we stated in our review, the metrics for temperature are neat, but Apple doesn’t offer any guidance about what your temperature means. The numbers we get just tell us how many degrees higher or lower our temperature was compared to the established baseline. For the average person, it’s hard to determine what you should do with that information. I hope that Apple adds better temperature sensors in the Series 9, perhaps by giving us the actual temperature in numbers or even helping us determine if changes in temperature are because of illness.
A brighter display
It would be nice to see Apple increase the brightness even more on the
- This hidden Apple Watch feature is better than I could have imagined
- The Apple Watch Ultra is the perfect women’s smartwatch — seriously
- I finally got an Apple Watch Ultra. Here are 3 ways it surprised me
- The Apple Watch Ultra’s Action button should be better than this
- Have an iPhone, iPad, or Apple Watch? You need to update it right now